Aboriginal Sovereignty Symposium

Flag of National Unity Government 'Sovereign Union'

Litigating the Boundaries of Sovereignty – Symposium Day 1

LIRC Symposium: Wednesday 23 May 2012

On 26 January 2012, on the day of the 40th anniversary of the establishment Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Canberra, a number of prominent Aboriginal activists advanced an articulated claim to the continuity of Aboriginal sovereignty in Australia. This claim to continuous sovereignty, uninfluenced by any proclamations to the contrary made by Captain Cook and Captain Phillips in 1770 and 1788 and uninterrupted by ever-changing colonial policies of the last two centuries, is supported by the use of cases, documents and doctrines that illustrate the possible existence of multiple coexisting sovereign claims on the same territorial jurisdiction. For example, one aspect of the claim will rely on the Pacific Islanders’ Protection Act 1872 and the impact of the Doctrine of Discovery on international Indigenous sovereignty, matters soon to be discussed at the Eleventh Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in May.

The Legal Intersections Research Centre at the University of Wollongong and the School of Law and Justice of Southern Cross University are jointly organising a one-day workshop to explore the legal and political implications of those claims. The workshop will specifically focus on discussing the complexities of litigating claims of Aboriginal sovereignty as a public interest issue by focusing on three case studies. The workshop aims to bring together leading Aboriginal activists, legal practitioners and scholars in the areas of law, politics and public culture.

Confirmed Speakers:

  • Michael Anderson, co-founder of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in 1972
  • Fred Hooper, Chair of the Northern Murray–Darling Basin Aboriginal Nations
  • Dr Charles Hawksley, University of Wollongong
  • Roy ‘Dootch’ Kennedy, Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy
  • Bruce Sinclair, Metis theatre artist, teacher, administrator, Canada Council for the Arts
  • Virginia Marshall, Solicitor

Interested participants have the opportunity to view documents related to the case studies that will be discussed at the workshop. If you are interested in receiving these documents please indicate your interest when you RSVP.

Location: University of Wollongong, Innovation Campus,
ITAMS Building 233, Room G12
HOW TO GET THERE - Local transport details

Date: Wednesday 23 May 2012
Time: 9:00am to 5:00pm
RSVP: 11 May 2012 to Felicia Martin: fmartin@uow.edu.au
Please note numbers are limited

pdfAboriginal Sovereignty Symposium 23rd May 2012 (pdf flyer)

Via SOVEREIGN UNION – National Unity Government

Posted in Community & Events, Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Land Holds Us

Poster for 'The Land Holds Us'

I can look back over 70 years on this part of the land. There was a richness of the relationships between people so you felt never alone. You felt secure, you felt you belonged. You also felt, from an early age, your responsibility; not only to the flora and fauna but to the song lines that tied you to the land. We always said pmerel atnyenem, we never said pmer nhenh tha atnyenem. That means, country owns or holds you, not you holding the country and becoming master of the land. The land was your mother, your father and everything else.

~ Rosalie Kunoth-Monks (Alyawarr and Anmatyerr Elder)

Posted in Culture & History | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Five Year ‘Certificate of Aboriginality’ to be Issued in 2013

Picture to challenge the stereotypes of Aboriginal identity having to be a black face.

Photo depicting the ‘Wathaurung Mob’. Acknowledgement to Bindi Cole

An Aboriginal group in Victoria is planning to issue certificates of Aboriginality with a five-year expiry date, after concerns were raised about people pretending to be Aboriginal.

The Dandenong and District Aborigines Co-operative, which issues the certificates to people who want to apply for Aboriginal housing or other programs, such as indigenous scholarships, will bring in the new system next year.

Chairwoman Margaret Gardiner said it ‘‘may seem strange, to have a certificate (of Aboriginality) that can expire, but it’s a way to protect us’’.

‘‘We’ve had people coming to us, saying ‘I’m an Aboriginal’ when they are not, and we have knocked a lot of them back, but what if somebody slips under the radar?’’ Dr Gardiner said.

‘‘Now we will have a way to take it (the certificate) back.’’

The Dandenong co-operative is one of several indigenous organisations that are working to stamp out ‘‘fraudulent’’ claims to Aboriginality. In an interview for The Weekend Australian Magazine today, Tasmanian Aboriginal activist Michael Mansell says that he has knocked back ‘‘thousands’’ of claims after the number of people in his state claiming to be Aboriginal became ‘‘just ridiculous’’.

Dr Gardiner’s husband, Gary Murray, who investigates claims to Aboriginality, says: ‘‘It’s fraud (for people to pretend) but you do get people doing it, just like some people defraud Centrelink.’’

Mr Murray says the number of genuine claims from paleskinned people identifying as Aboriginal is also increasing, because ‘‘families that once tried to hide it now feel proud of it’’.

While it has long been understood by the federal government — and by the courts — that the colour of a person’s skin has nothing to do with whether they are Aboriginal, Mr Murray says paleskinned people often find it hard to get a certificate, particularly if they were not raised with knowledge of their ancestry.

Earlier this year, for example, he was asked to conduct an investigation on behalf of a 17-year-old girl who had not previously identified as Aboriginal but wanted to accept a Rotary scholarship for an indigenous student.

She told the co-operative that her family had long understood there was an Aboriginal ancestor somewhere in the family tree, and Mr Murray was able to prove it. But Dr Gardiner says: ‘‘We turn away plenty of people who come and say, ‘I’ve got an ancestor, and now I want a cheap business loan’, if we can’t find proof.’’

At the other end of the spectrum is the case of Dallas Scott, whose appearance strongly suggests that he is Aboriginal, but who had his initial application for a certificate knocked back, despite him having ‘‘the kind of face that makes some people treat me like I’m no better than the shit on their shoes, especially when I was younger’’.

Mr Scott has personal experience of how quickly skin colour can fade over generations. His partner, Kate Shipley, is white and when she became pregnant with twins, friends joked how funny it would be if one was born white, and the other black — and that is exactly what happened.

Mr Scott says the experience of having one black twin and one white twin had prompted him to start a website to ‘‘put colour back on the table’’ in the debate over what it means to be Aboriginal.

Via The Australian

Posted in News & Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Call for Delegates to Attend Assembly of Aboriginal Unity Government

Flag of National Unity Government 'Sovereign Union'

All Aboriginal nations are being called on to send two delegates to the inaugural assembly of the interim national unity government in Wollongong in May.

“This gathering to form the Interim Sovereign Union National Unity Government is so important, as the federal government and their Uncle Tom collaborators are working overtime to indoctrinate our children and youth into their way of thinking by falsely promoting that recognition in the Constitution will give our people something,” the spokesman of the movement, Michael Anderson, writes in a media release.

Since the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal Embassy in Canberra in January, Anderson, its last remaining founder, has travelled the country promoting the idea of sovereignty. He reports that 40 nations in the Murray Darling Basin have already come on board.

The assembly will be held at the Sandon Point Aboriginal Embassy Wollongong, south of Sydney, on the 23rd and 24th of May.

On the first day, 23rd of May, two universities, South Cross and Wollongong law faculties will host a law symposium to discuss the continuing sovereignty of Aboriginal people as an introduction to this history-making event.

“It would be helpful if I can get an idea of who may be coming by the end of April. This is so we can determine the numbers for catering purposes on the first day, what we will need have this number for the second day so that we can call for donations in kind of food and tea and coffee for the second day.

“I must emphasise that there is NO money to assist anyone to travel, and that it is the responsibility of each nation to raise their own money for their delegates.

“Like the 40th Embassy anniversary in Canberra, we ask that people bring a tent as we intend to create another tent city. In part this is in keeping with our cultural norms to gather around a camp fire, which is part of our connection with the natural environment. We would like to be flash but this is not yet achievable. We are a grassroots movement very much in our infancy and we will grow. Should people be able to afford the comforts then that is their choice.

“This is a liberation movement that seeks to gain our rightful place in the world and to correct our history. This is a people’s movement motivated to take responsibility for our own destiny through a right of self-determination as is guaranteed under the United Nations Charter.”

The complete statement

Michael Anderson – Goodooga, northwest NSW, 22nd March 12

I’m calling on all Aboriginal Nations to send their two delegates to the inaugural Sovereign Union, [Interim] National Unity Government Assembly to be held at the Sandon Point Aboriginal Embassy Wollongong south of Sydney on the 23rd and 24th May.

On the first day, 23rd of May, two universities, South Cross and Wollongong law faculties will be hosting a law symposium to discuss the continuing sovereignty of Aboriginal people as an introduction to this history-making event. It would be helpful if I can get an idea of who may be coming by the end of April. This is so we can determine the numbers for catering purposes on the first day, what we will need have this number for the second day so that we can call for donations in kind in respect to food and tea and coffee for the second day.

I must emphasise that there is NO money to assist anyone to travel, and that it is the responsibility of each nation to raise their own money for their delegates.

Like the 40th Embassy anniversary we ask that people bring a tent as we intend to create another tent city. In part this is in keeping with our cultural norms to gather around a camp fire which is part of our connection with the natural environment. We would like to be flash but this is not yet achievable. We are a grassroots movement very much in our infancy and we will grow. Should people be able to afford the comforts then that is their choice.

This is a liberation movement that seeks to gain our rightful place in the world and to correct our history. This is a people’s movement motivated to take responsibility for our own destiny through a right of self-determination as is guaranteed under the United Nations Charter.

The Sovereign Union, [Interim] National Unity Government will not accept second class rights as are prescribed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It is not acceptable to have the invader society tell us through the United Nations that for the sake of their territorial integrity, we the First Nations Peoples have to accept second class rights in order for them to maintain the status quo and their illegal rule over us.

It is now time for us as Aboriginal peoples of the world to stand up and correct the wrongs. These are indeed great challenges but then we need to look at ourselves and see what is happening to our children and youth. Death is their greatest friend, it seems. They cannot accept nor tolerate what is happening to them and too many of our people seem to think that we can negotiate with the invader society to improve our plight. No way, the invader society are themselves struggling, what would make us think that they can and will develop programs to help our mob?

We just need to look at this shame program called ‘closing the gap’. Who do they think we are? Prime Minister Gillard and her dysfunctional Labor Party government are relying heavily on their Production Commission Report that allegedly indicates an improvement. Statistics fail to tell the truth. What is happening on the ground is what counts and when our people can see and feel a difference they will let everyone know, not just through a report, either.

This gathering to form the Interim Sovereign Union national Unity Government is so important as the federal government and their Uncle Tom collaborators are working overtime to indoctrinate our children and youth into their way of thinking by falsely promoting that recognition in the Constitution will give our people something. Well then if this is the case let them tell the students what and how we will get something. What will we get? How will it alter our situation? How will it address the racism being suffered by our people? How will it lift the racist Northern Territory Intervention?

It is wonderful to get educated in private schools but also find out what our people’s struggle is about. It is certainly not about seeking to be accepted through a policy of assimilation.

It is not acceptable for the expert panel for constitutional change to say in their report, “we cannot deal with sovereignty because it might upset the white population”. What rot!

By the way, children, Aboriginal people have been voting in the state and federal elections since when. In fact our people have been voting in elections, if they were not considered as receiving government rations and were independent. Aborigines have also voted in the very first election for the national parliament. You youth are being duped for the sake of assimilation.

It must be remembered that the people they call the ‘radicals’ are the ones who caused historical changes to occur. No public servant can achieve that.
Posted in Law, News & Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Open Letter to the Australian PM From ‘Sovereign Union’ Spokesman

Logo for Sovereign Union with words by Aboriginal Leader Michael Anderson.

In an ‘open letter’ to Australia’s prime Minister Julie Gillard, Michael Anderson requests an answer as to whether the 1967 referendum to amend section 127 of the Constitution was valid.

He calls upon the Commonwealth government to provide the written evidentiary proof that the States did in fact refer this matter of Aboriginal Affairs to the Commonwealth, as required under Section 105A of the Australian Constitution and asks, ‘if so, were any conditions applied for the referral’.

Mr Anderson states that if due process was not followed properly the Commonwealth government has committed a major fraud against the Australian public.

Open letter to PM Julia Gillard

18 March 2012

Dear Prime Minister,

I am writing to seek an answer as to whether the 1967 referendum to amend section 127 of the Constitution was valid.

I call upon the Commonwealth government to provide the written evidentiary proof that the States did in fact refer this matter of Aboriginal Affairs to the Commonwealth, as required under Section 105A of the Australian Constitution; and, if so, were any conditions applied for the referral.

If due process was not followed properly the Commonwealth government has committed a major fraud against the Australian public.

In the case of NSW, it took the Commonwealth and the States until 1975 to divide the responsibility of Aboriginal Affairs between the Commonwealth and the states. Similar arrangements with other States were made at this time.

This is an important consideration because, since the Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1875, it is incumbent on the colonial states to negotiate with Aboriginal Peoples over land acquisition as the colony expanded, but Aboriginal Peoples have been defrauded by the use of superior force to remove them from their lands and waters, resulting in our people becomes displaced Peoples and refuges in this continent.

The second matter the 1967 referendum dealt with was the deceitful and fraudulent method by which they obtained patrimony. There was a legal reason why Aboriginal people were not counted in the census; because they were independent Peoples as recognised in Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1875, in which Aboriginal Peoples were legally identified as having independent sovereignty.

Our understanding is that Section 127 of the Australian Constitution:
‘In reckoning the numbers of the people of the Commonwealth, or of a State or other part of the Commonwealth, aboriginal natives shall not be counted.’

was inserted by the Home Office in London during the drafting of the British Act of parliament which created the Australian Constitution in 1901. Presumably the Home Office was well aware of the power and implications of the Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1875.

In effect the 1967 referendum was a unilateral attempt by the Commonwealth to fraudulently incorporate Aboriginal people as Australian citizens destined for assimilation, without our free prior and informed consent.

I draw your attention to the fact that the recent proposal for a referendum in 2013 to, at least, include Aboriginal people in the preamble of the Australian Constitution is yet another attempt by the Commonwealth to fraudulently acquire Aboriginal acquiescence to an illegal occupying colonial power.  The Aboriginal individuals advocating for inclusion of Aboriginal people in the preamble of the Constitution are committing treason against Aboriginal Peoples.

I look forward to receiving the information requested.

Regards

Michael Anderson

Posted in Law, News & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Australian Government to Pass Law Allowing the State to Sterilize, Electroshock and Restrain Children Without Parents Consent

The Mental Health Bill is being compared to a form of Nazism.

Another draft mental health bill, this time in Australia is mirroring global efforts in what is now an international and deliberate surge by government officials to remove parental consent. If passed, the shocking new law will allow children who are considered sufficiently mature, to be subjected to horrifying procedures including sterilization and electroshock.

An important message by the Director of Applied Scholastics in Western Australia based in Perth, Alison Tarrant was sent to the public on behalf of The Athena School . “Some very disturbing information has come across our path in relation to a Draft Mental Health Bill which concerns our precious children and our rights as parents,” said Tarrant in a statement in the February 29, 2012 letter.

Tarrant initially thought the information lacked authenticity and was later astonished when she found out the document was legitimate. “When I read it I was quite shocked and thought someone was playing a joke on me but then I went onto the main website here  which is the Government Department of the Mental Health Commission and looked at the actual Draft Bill,” she added.

A health website recently reported that vaccinating without parental knowledge will soon become the norm across the world. There is now a confirmed global initiative to remove any consent parents have to safeguard their children’s health while simultaneously removing any chance of informed consent by those who are considered of “mature” age regardless of their status as a child or teenager. These proposed bills are poised to become law and their frequency is increasing especially in the U.S, U.K, Canada, Australia.

Some of the more disturbing clauses draft mental health bill  include:

  • CHILDREN OF ANY AGE TO CONSENT TO STERILISATION: If a psychiatrist decides that a child (under 18 years) has sufficient maturity, he or she will be able to consent to sterilisation. Parental consent will not be needed. Only after the sterilisation procedure has been performed does it have to be reported and then only to the Chief Psychiatrist. [Pages: 135 & 136 of the Draft Mental Health Bill 2011]
  • 12 YEAR OLDS WILL BE ABLE TO CONSENT TO PSYCHOSURGERY: Banned in N.S.W. and the N.T., psychosurgery irreversibly damages the brain by surgery, burning or inserting electrodes. This draft bill proposes to allow a 12 year old child, if considered to be sufficiently mature by a psychiatrist, to be able to consent to psychosurgery. Once the child has consented it goes before the Mental Health Tribunal (MHT) for approval. Parental consent is also not needed for the MHT to approve the psychosurgery. [Pages: 108, 109, 110, 197,198, 199, 213]
  • 12 YEAR OLDS WILL BE ABLE TO CONSENT TO ELECTROSHOCK (ECT): Electroshock is hundreds of volts of electricity to the head.  Any child aged 12 and over, whom a child and adolescent psychiatrist decides is “mature” enough, will be able to consent to electroshock.  Also, once consent is given, there is no requirement for parents or anyone, including the MHT, to approve the electroshock. Electroshock should be banned. Its use on the elderly, pregnant women and children is especially destructive. [Pages: 100, 101, 103, 104, 194, 105]
  • RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION OF CHILDREN: Children can be restrained in a psychiatric institution, with the use of mechanical restraint (manacles, belts, straps etc.) and bodily force. Chemical restraint – the use of psychiatric drugs to subdue and control the person – is not covered in the draft bill, so there are no legal safeguards to prevent its application. Death can result from all forms of restraint. [Pages: 122, 121, 113, 246]
  • INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF CHILDREN: A psychiatrist can involuntarily detain any child for up to 14 days if “suspected” of mental illness. Parents will not be able to discharge their child during this period and take them home. The psychiatrist can then make a “continuation order” to continue the detainment for up to 3 months and thereafter for each subsequent 3 month period. During detainment, the child could be drugged, restrained, secluded, given electroshock if over 12 and could be put into a ward with adults. Parental consent is not required to continue the detainment or for any treatment, including the child being placed on a legal order to continue to receive drugs at home. The MHT hold hearings on the detainment of a child, but there is no guarantee the child will be able to go home. In 2010/11 there were 1,248 hearings for all ages and only 58 people had their status changed from involuntary to voluntary. [Pages: 21, 22, 35, 19, 107, 36, 53, 54, 183 -185, 190, 191, 213, 214,18, 46, 47, 48, 65, 66, 70, 73, 75-77]
  • WHO WILL BE ABLE TO DETAIN A CHILD IS NOT FULLY KNOWN: An “authorised mental health practitioner” can also detain a child or adult in the draft bill. Exactly who an authorised mental health practitioner is, is not defined by the draft bill. The Chief Psychiatrist can literally give anyone or any profession the power to detain someone just because he considers they are qualified and by publishing the decision in the Gazette. This clause must be removed from the Draft Mental Health Bill 2011. Only a judge or magistrate should have the power to order someone be detained, and only with full legal representation for the person facing depravation of liberty [Pages: 246, 247, 21, 22]

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS DRAFT BILL?: The Western Australia Mental Health Commission (MHC) were responsible for writing the Draft Mental Health Bill 2011, with Mental Health Commissioner and clinical psychologist, Mr Eddie Bartnik overseeing the process.

Tarrant suggests everybody write a letter saying exactly what you think of this absurd legislation. Write expressing your objections to the Mental Health Commission and to your state legislator.

Email: on contactus@mentalhealth.wa.gov.au  or

Mail: GPO Box X2299 Perth Business Centre, W.A. 6847

Send a copy of your objections to the Mental Health Minister, Health Minister and your local Member of Parliament.

Find their addresses at: www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/memblist.nsf/WAllMembers

Please don’t hestitate from speaking out against these human rights violations. This destructive movement against humanity is global and it’s a pressing concern of grand proportions. If we don’t speak out now, the health and safety of future generations are in serious jeopardy.

Via here

 

Posted in Law, News & Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Australian Government is Caught in a Legal & Political Conundrum

Sovereign Union - National Unity Government  Australia is now in a real political and legal conundrum, not because of the Julia Gillard win nor because we have an unpopular leader of the opposition in Tony Abbott as the possible alternative, but because Australia is also confronted with the fact that two recognized sovereign states now exist on the one land mass. One rules by the sheer weight of numbers, the other has been subjugated by force.

I’ve been having talks with non-Aboriginal people since the 26th January incident at our Tent Embassy in Canberra and can now state that various sections of the non-Aboriginal community acknowledge Aboriginal claims to this country.

Aboriginal claims are validated by the English law that came into existence when Queen Victoria issued an Order in Council to the effect that England did not claim sovereignty over Aboriginal people nor dominion over Aboriginal places.

The solidarity coming from the non-Aboriginal sector is reassuring to Aboriginal people that we can push our claims forward.

Mrs. Jessie Kuar Singh  is a most senior lady within the multicultural community and Executive Director of Multi-Faith Affairs of the United Sikhs , President of the Inter-Faith, Inter—Cultural Network Foundation along with other inter-faith bodies around the world. Mrs. Singh said that the bodies with which she is associated support our push to establish the National Unity Government. We will have further discussions with Mrs. Sigh and the multi-faith groups with whom she is associated in the near future.

Other recent developments include discussions with Reverend Lindsay McDowell, Chairman of the Southern Cross Missions of Australia. Their intention is to give unconditional recognition to Aboriginal people  that the English did invade this country and Australia really needs more than reconciliation. The Southern Cross Missions have been working with many Aboriginal communities across Australia, supported by very respected people such as Mr Ossie Cruse of the south Coast of NSW and Mr. Tom Hallas of Canberra. It is a breath of fresh air to have both non-Aborigines and Aboriginal people working together to get it right, as we need Australia to see us for who we are, not for who they want us to be. At this point we have established a great working relationship in this regard on our stated objective to establish the National Unity Government.

There have been many other offers from individuals and groups who are very interested in engaging with National Unity Government and have offered help financially as well as in kind.

There is no doubt that in the coming months the Australian government will attempt to roll out government aid to Aboriginal communities to buy their loyalty and have them commit to the much needed help that our communities so desperately need. It is this desperation that the government will use in an attempt to win the hearts and minds of not only our people but the general community as a whole. Then the government propaganda machine can start expressing to our people how much they love us and admire us and our culture and the need to increase their efforts with their ‘Bridging the Gap’ campaign. This is so predictable.

Just look at the talk now going around. Warren Mundine to replace Arbib. I would have thought that they would have wanted to increase the Labor party’s intelligentsia, not decrease it, if they want to win the next election. But then again since Mundine and Jenny Macklin have a working relationship with the opposition leader Tony Abbott, the far right of the Labor Party is seeking to govern in concert with Abbott. Wow what a thought. Warren Mundine if he is successful good luck to him but he needs to say that he is of the Bundjarlung nation on the far north coast of NSW and he and the government must understand that while he is from the Bundjarlung nation he does not have a mandate to speak for other Aboriginal people. Should he seek to do so, he will be breaking Aboriginal customary law.

It is time for the Labor Party to unload its political factional baggage and go for youth and freshness. In fact the National Unity Government would prefer to deal with a leader such as Ms. Penny Wong or Bill Shorten. I believe that either of these two as a Labor Party leader would serve this country well.

What we need now is for us to have political leadership that can see a future for this country. The National Unity Government seeks to negotiate with visionaries, not people whose ambitions are personal aggrandizement with no vision at all other than to have a policy of ‘same old same old’.

Michael Anderson Sovereign Union – National Unity Government

Posted in Law, News & Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Australian Government Don’t Care Enough About Aboriginal People

Aboriginal activist with flag at Nyoongar Tent Ambassy.Photo Courtesy of Nyoongar Tent Embassy

Well placed sources, including parliamentarians, in the Australian Labor Party, the Coalition, and the Greens have made surprising comments that issues afflicting Aboriginal peoples and ‘Aboriginal affairs’ are in the ‘too hard basket’ or ‘best swept under the carpet’.

A source close to the Office of the Prime Minister said, “Indigenous issues are tough because they affect so few Australians – they are a small minority so the government really is not urged on by community or the polls to do anything about them. Indigenous Australians are less than 3% of Australians and less than half of them vote. Other than the odd pollie talking up Indigenous issues as part of their own moral platform we have no experts in government – Jenny Macklin doesn’t count, she’s just a face for the portfolio – so we just franchise out the problems to agencies and they deal with Indigenous issues, they produce on report after another – best swept under the carpet so to speak and they deal with it. In general Australians don’t care.”

For many Aboriginal peoples, Kevin Rudd was seen as the great beacon of hope in helping to address Aboriginal disadvantage and in being one of the few Prime Ministers not to stand in the way of Aboriginal peoples’ self determination – he delivered ‘The Apology’ and this opened the door to hope – however Rudd’s demise and the NT Intervention have put paid to this, so it appears.

Recently, Western Australian state minister for Indigenous Affairs. Peter Collier said that he did not have the answers to addressing Aboriginal disadvantage and horrific incarceration rates. There was little public comment from anyone – you would have presumed that someone would have said, ‘well, if you don’t have answers what are you doing in the role?’

The National Indigenous Times has sent a number of questions to state, territory and federal governments and political parties asking what is being done and what more needs to be done to reduce and remedy Aboriginal disadvantage. In some cases we have provided examples where for instance resources could be allocated to crises centres, mobile medical clinics, education staff, and other opportunity – underwritten by expert advice – for instance, in Adelaide the Aboriginal community endured 8 premature deaths, 3 by suicide, of its young people, within the first 13 days of January – the state government is yet to allocate resources to an 24/7 Aboriginal crisis centre.

A parliamentary source in the ALP said, “Our government does not want to discuss Aboriginal issues because we don’t know how to deal with the public shame of failure. We are now just as guilty of neglecting Aboriginal people as were the Howard government. We are part of the (NT) Intervention. Macklin is the wrong person for the job, most of us are not the right ones for the job when it comes to Aboriginal people, but there are some right people we could tap into but they haven’t done their dues in the party to be able to push out Macklin. We have a couple of Senators and backbenchers who would do much better and who’d probably argue against the Intervention and demand for fairer policies and not just slide along with the Closing the Gap monitoring reports bullshit.”

WA Aboriginal Legal Services CEO, Dennis Eggington recently said that the Closing the Gap reports are the lowest common denominator and are piecemeal. He said, “Is this the best our governments can do for Aboriginal peoples?”

The source said, “Unfortunately Gerry, as you often say, racism comes in many forms and we in government have a long way to go before we get it right for Aboriginal people. We have to change but we don’t, some care and very much so, but not enough, not at this time. Maybe we need to get more Aboriginal people into our party sooner rather than later. It is embarassing that the Liberals have outdone us on this.”

The National Indigenous Times asked federal member for the WA seat of Hasluck, Ken Wyatt, a man with Wongi, Yamatji and Nyoongar heritage, if in the event the Coalition secured government if he would seek the Aboriginal Affairs ministerial portfolio. “The Coalition has an effective shadow minister for Indigenous Affairs in Senator Nigel Scullion and I would be honoured to play any role within the executive of a Liberal government.”

A well placed source in the Coalition said, “Ken Wyatt came in to government with a number of statements about ways forward for Indigenous people but since speaking with Tony Abbott, let us just say Ken’s views have been modified. However, he may finish up getting the Indigenous portfolio but we understand he is also interested in Health, so maybe he’d do something for Indigenous people through this.”

The source said, “The Coalition will spend money on Indigenous people but we won’t give carte blanche on any rights issues. We don’t expend much energy talking about Indigenous people except for a little of the time when it has to do with elections.”

A source in the Greens said, “We could do more, we certainly don’t have any group dialogue on Aboriginal peoples’ issues and we trust much of it in Rachel Siewert which is probably a mistake. We go off the reports we read and merely respond to them, we have no genuine policies. We speak up in public where someone else has raised something and agree but the party room and council meetings and our National Conferences hear very little, if anything, on Aboriginal issues – we should be leading the way. Gerry, I’ll take it upon myself to push for more said and done when it comes to our conferences.”

Gerry Georgatos

Posted in Indymedia

Posted in News & Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gillard Must Face Aboriginal Sovereignty Now

National Unity Aboriginal Government
Press Statement

Michael Anderson, spokesperson
‘Sovereign Union’ – National unity government
Goodooga, northwest NSW
26th February 2012

(Updated)

The Federal government has a cheek to call Aboriginal communities dysfunctional. I think it time they apologise for these denigrating inferences, given the absolute dysfunction of the Labor party as shown in recent times. Even more disappointing is the fact that they try to tell Aboriginal people and the rest of the world that the democratic way is the only way. The leadership battles, personal abuses, exposure of Cabinet secrets, muck-raking and intrusion into family and personal lives as is popularly used in the United States and New South Wales in respect to the personal moralities of politicians, while searching for pure white puritan politician, is a process that is undiplomatic and unbecoming.

The incidents that occurred during our 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy [26 to 28 January in Canberra] certainly show how low and unethical Australian politicians can be to gain political ‘brownie points’ by exploiting this emotionally charged gathering, where grassroots Aboriginal people had gone to speak of their continuing grievances and were seeking to locate solutions that could be put to the colonising government.

It is interesting that Mr Kevin Rudd has seen an opportunity to highlight the Gillard government’s inadequacy to deal with Aboriginal issues and to exercise a diplomatic process to deal with that situation that arose which led to PM Gillard’s entrapment in the Lobby Restaurant and then her inability to extract herself in a diplomatic and dignified way, losing her blue suede shoe in the process.

PM Gillard at the Australia Day  / Aboriginal Tent Embassy protests.

After her leadership spill Gillard needs to address Aboriginal Sovereignty.

Had Julia Gillard had any experience in diplomacy she could have prevented the unsightly images of herself being dragged out by security. Clearly diplomacy is one of her weak points.

‘The Aboriginal problem’ will never go away we see political leadership in this country representing the non-Aboriginal community, show true diplomatic and political leadership without internal dysfunction. The government continues to push ‘governance training down our people’s throats in our communities, but it seems to me this is a course they should undertake for the benefit of Australia as a whole.

The governments that followed Whitlam and Fraser have been politically retroactive, focusing too much on being seen to be ‘nice and pure’ in the eyes of the international community, thereby paying too little regard to the job at hand with the internal problems of their nation. If they can put away their international ambition to have a seat on the UN Security Council, they may be able to win support from their Australian constituency, focusing more attention on the socio-economic needs of Australians. There is far more to this country than exploiting mineral and petroleum wealth.

If any political party is worried about the environment then they need to re-evaluate the massive resource boom, because the methane from the open cut coal mining far exceeds that of cattle, sheep, camels and kangaroos. Another environmental threat that is not discussed is the fine dust clouds floating across this continent and impacting on the respiratory systems of the constituency Australia wide.

The emerging Aboriginal National Unity Government is prepared to talk to functional governments and or oppositions who have an open mind and a political will capable of dealing with the real issues of Aboriginal people and not continuing the ‘band aid’ solutions that have cost plenty in the previous decades yet still fail to hit the mark.

(Gillard has now won) the Labor leadership spill, we call upon the next Prime Minister to meet with us to talk about the British law that recognised Aboriginal sovereignty and dominion over our land separate from the colonial administration. It is time the federal government realised that under English law the parliaments and legal system that they created comes from their colonial head of power, Britain, and the whole parliamentary system has been set up for their purposes, whilst at the same time Britain brought into law the separate political and legal status of Aboriginal people in an 1875 law in an unequivocal and unambiguous way, that Britain did not claim sovereignty over Aboriginal people, their leaders and chiefs, nor did they claim sovereignty and dominion over our places.

It is time now that we commence formal discussions in this regard, but the government knows full well that they cannot do this without a truly representative Aboriginal government or they are required by domestic and international law to speak with every different linguistic Aboriginal nation within Australia, because one nation cannot speak for another nation. This is Aboriginal Law/Lore.

Sovereign Union – National Union Government

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Elder Speaks Out at Nyoongar Tent Embassy

Uncle Ben Taylor an Aboriginal Elder at the Nyoongar Tent Embassy, Perth, Heirisson Island in the Swan River, WA.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Posted in Videos & Documentaries | Tagged , , | Leave a comment